Acute vs Chronic Disease

Cancer, Drugs and Television:
How modern medicine has failed the chronic patient


Modern conventional medicine is full of wonders and remarkable things. Animals and people are brought back to life after suffering severe accidents and emergencies. We transplant organs, fix bones, and replace faulty joints. But we do not seem to make much progress with long term illnesses and degenerative diseases. In cancer, statistically we are winning the battle; but patients who are declared cancer-free die due to seemingly unrelated illnesses.

Modern conventional medicine developed around the treatment of infectious diseases, which were the plight of previous generations. The discovery of germs and antibiotics made it possible to save lives otherwise lost to infections. Advances in anatomy, antisepsis and anesthetics, together with antibiotics, made surgical procedures safe. Vaccines succeeded in preventing and in some cases eradicating crippling infectious diseases.

A common feature in the successes of conventional medicine is acute disease. Acute diseases appear with great intensity of signs and symptoms, and rapidly result in either recovery or death. Conventional medicine (human and veterinary) is structured, philosophically and physically to treat acute diseases. The obsession of modern industrial society with visual stimuli further feeds the acute model in modern medicine. Emergency medicine and surgery are the most highly regarded disciplines in medicine. These disciplines offer glamour and high visual impact, and provide quasi-miraculous results giving rapid and radical relief, that look good on TV and can be resolved within the short term of a television program.

However, as societies become wealthier and technologically developed, chronic diseases such as cancer, degenerative and others become more prevalent. Yet a medical system geared to treat acute disease does what it knows best: it treats any disease as an acute disease, where the event must unfold within a short lapse of time. The disease is seen as an invasion (as with infections) and treated with a strong drug to kill the invader; surgical removal of the diseased part is the preferred option. Even something as simple as the clinician's appointment structure is geared toward acute disease: the problem or list of problems must be addressed, diagnosed, and a treatment formulated, preferably within a 15 minute consultation.

Medical interventions rely on the healing response of the organism. When there is an injury, the body mounts a healing response. Medical intervention is crucial to remove the perpetuating cause (e.g. an invading organism), or to surgically repair a damaged tissue. The nature of chronic disease is that, although it may have originated in an external cause, the perpetuation of the disease is the result of a disturbance of the whole organism, which cannot regenerate. Medical intervention based on the acute model simply provides temporary relief and does little to improve the underlying weakness of the organism. Some conventional treatments suppress acute symptoms of the disease, actually worsening the chronic disease.

Therefore, the treatment of chronic disease requires an approach aimed not only at removing the external perpetuating factors but at repairing and stimulating the regenerative mechanisms. This involves taking a holistic approach to the patient where habits, diet and environment need to be considered. Homeopathic treatment is particularly effective in chronic disease because it is directly aimed at reactivating inactive genes and enzymes, hence directly stimulating regeneration systems. Occasionally, standard or alternative drugs are required to control opportunistic infections or rapidly eliminate suffering-causing signs.

Regardless of the type of drugs used, in the treatment of chronic disease it is essential that the clinician follows the patient regularly and identifies the subtle changes at the mental, general or particular levels, which give clues to the progress of the patient. The Laws of Cure from homeopathic theory offer a framework to assess progress, regardless of the type of drug or treatment used. In addition the concept of organic balance, used in Traditional Chinese Medicine and Traditional Chinese Veterinary Medicine, provides an objective and concise framework to manage chronic disease in such way that a breakdown is detected before it results in an acute episode.


return to top of page